Fellowship Outcomes

Student Projects

Every Future Lawyers fellow finishes the programme with an original piece of legal work. These are the moot court memorials from our Aug 29 Cohort. Click any project to read it.

14 shown

Memorial

Strict Liability and Willful Blindness

For Slamsung: Pixelverse knew the IP risk, failed to verify FormGen's output and commercially used protected technology.

K. GarodiaView Project
Memorial

Commercial Use After an AI Glitch

For Slamsung: direct infringement follows from making and selling the patented product, even without an intent to copy.

I. TaurbekView Project
Memorial

The Duty to Verify AI-Generated Work

For Slamsung: using an unverified formula and deploying AI without safeguards created responsibility for the resulting harm.

A. RaoView Project
Memorial

Unforeseeable AI Error and Innocent Use

For Pixelverse: a third-party AI malfunction retrieved hidden data despite instructions to create an original formula.

M. EstiphanosView Project
Memorial

Commercial Responsibility for AI Output

For Slamsung: Pixelverse cannot avoid liability after using and selling an AI-generated formula without checking its source.

D. BurgerView Project
Memorial

Liability Follows the Product

For Slamsung: the company remains responsible for an infringing product and for operating AI without adequate guardrails.

A. RanaView Project
Memorial

Good Faith and the Leaked-Archive Defense

For Pixelverse: its prompt showed care, while the publicly accessible leak broke the chain of trade-secret liability.

D. Bridges · Mentor: Tsion DebebeView Project
Memorial

No Knowledge, No Misappropriation

For Pixelverse: documented instructions to avoid Slamsung's method show no intent or knowledge of the AI's hidden source.

L. RobertsView Project
Memorial

Unexpected Copying and Lack of Intent

For Pixelverse: FormGen independently accessed leaked information and presented it as an original invention.

J. MalikView Project
Memorial

Missing Guardrails Are Not Improper Conduct

For Pixelverse: trade-secret misuse requires improper conduct or knowledge, neither of which the company possessed.

M. ShangalovaView Project
Memorial

Proving Patent Claims and Trade-Secret Knowledge

For Pixelverse: an AI glitch does not replace proof that every patent limitation or statutory knowledge requirement was met.

J. PotapenkoView Project
Memorial

Reasonable Royalties for AI-Mediated Infringement

For Pixelverse: any innocent infringement should receive a limited royalty, while the trade-secret claim fails for lack of knowledge.

P. Katsepontes-SampalisView Project
Memorial

An AI Glitch Without Knowing Misuse

For Pixelverse: the court may weigh accidental patent use, but the company did not knowingly obtain a trade secret.

C. RayhanView Project
Memorial

Autonomous AI Error and Human Intent

For Pixelverse: FormGen acted independently, with no proof that the company intended to copy or knew it had protected data.

A. SarafiView Project